 |
A Dental-Based, Athletic Trainer-Mediated Spit Tobacco Cessation Program for
Professional
Baseball Players
A cessation program involving dental professionals proved to well-received
by two baseball
clubs during 1997 spring training.
By Margaret M. Walsh, EdD; John C. Greene, DMD, MPH; James A. Ellison,
DDS, MPH; Mark
A. Letendre, ATC; and Ned Bergert, ATC
 |
During 1997 spring training, the National Spit Tobacco Education Program provided a
spit (smokeless) tobacco intervention program to 16 professional baseball clubs. The program
consisted of an awareness-raising presentation and an opportunity to discuss quitting spit
tobacco use with an expert cessation counselor. For two clubs, however, a more extensive
intervention was pilot-tested for feasibility and acceptability among their major- and
minor-league teams during their regularly scheduled health examinations at the beginning of
spring
training. The intervention included an oral exam by a dentist who advised spit tobacco users to
stop and pointed out any spit tobacco-associated lesions in the player's mouth, brief cessation
counseling by a specially trained dental hygienist, and ongoing support and follow-up by the
certified athletic trainer to promote cessation. Findings from this pilot study indicate that this
intervention, which is dependent upon involvement of dental professionals, was feasible to
implement during spring training and appeared to be well-received by the athletes. Dental
professionals are in an excellent position to advise and help spit tobacco users to quit and can
have an important role in helping youth overcome this rapidly growing addiction.
|
Article copyright 1998 Journal of the California Dental Association.
Photographs copyright of the authors.
During spring training in 1997, the National Spit Tobacco Education
Program (NSTEP), funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and operated
by Oral Health America, collaborated with the athletic trainers in professional
baseball to provide a spit tobacco intervention program to 16 professional
baseball clubs, eight in Arizona and eight in Florida. The goals were to
generate awareness about the hazards of spit tobacco and to motivate players
to quit tobacco use. These awareness-raising sessions were presented by
Joe Garagiola, Baseball Hall of Fame broadcaster, former major-leaguer,
and national chairman for NSTEP; Bill Tuttle, former major-leaguer and
victim of a spit tobacco-related oral cancer; and Tuttle's wife, Gloria
Tuttle. Following their presentations, all major- and minor-league athletes
on these 16 clubs were offered an opportunity for individual counseling
with an expert spit tobacco cessation counselor, and the athletic trainers
were provided with a brief in-service training on nicotine replacement
therapy, self-help cessation strategies, and a toll-free telephone number
for follow-up consultation with an expert cessation counselor as needed.
For two clubs in Arizona, however, a more extensive trainer-mediated, dental-based
intervention was provided to members of their two major-league teams and
their 10 associated minor-league teams over a period of 11 days. This extended
intervention was offered to these two clubs as a pilot test to determine
the feasibility of its implementation and its acceptability to athletes
and athletic trainers. The intervention consisted of an additional training
component for the athletic trainers, to prepare them to assume a more active
role in helping athletes with their cessation efforts, and a dental component.
The dental component included an oral mucosal examination by a dentist
who pointed out spit tobacco-associated tissue damage in a user's own mouth
and advised him to quit his tobacco use, a brief cessation counseling session
by a dental hygienist on ways to get ready to quit and to cope with cravings
and situations that trigger spit tobacco use, and ongoing support and follow-up
by the athletic trainer. This article describes this pilot athletic trainer/dental
component and reports the results.
Methods
Recruitment and Training
In January 1997, the head certified athletic trainers of the San Francisco
Giants and the Anaheim Angels major-league baseball teams agreed to collaborate
with researchers from the University of California at San Francisco in
providing an oral cancer screening examination by a dentist and brief spit
tobacco cessation counseling by a dental hygienist for all club members
during their regularly scheduled health examinations at the beginning of
spring training in Arizona. All certified athletic trainers associated
with each club received additional training on site in behavioral methods
and nicotine replacement therapy to assist an athlete's quit attempt. Athletic
trainers were encouraged to provide ongoing support and motivation during
the quitting process and were given the toll-free telephone number of an
expert cessation counselor as a resource in the event that an athlete needed
more intensive problem-solving and supportive treatment.
To deliver the dental component, two Arizona-based dentist and dental hygienist
teams were recruited. They were trained in a two-hour session on the negative
health effects of spit tobacco use, how to identify and assess the severity
of spit tobacco-associated oral lesions, the oral exam protocol (Table
1), the common elements of spit tobacco cessation counseling, an overview
of how the nicotine patch system and nicotine gum work, indications and
contraindications for use of nicotine replace therapy, instructions for
use of the therapy, how to assess signs and symptoms of nicotine withdrawal
and toxicity, and side effects of therapy and what to do when they appear.
Throughout the training, the importance of confidentiality and the need
to ignore the celebrity status of individual athletes (i.e., no autographs
or photographs) were emphasized.
| Table 1
Protocol for Dental Component
Ask about spit tobacco use status and patterns of use and examine mouth
for lesions.
|
| Advise all users to stop.
- Give clear cessation message (i.e., "I think it is important
for you to stop suing spit tobacco now to protect your current and future
health."
- Link use to his present or potential symptoms (e.g., point out oral
lesions in his mouth or in photographs of mouths of other athletes) and/or
his family situation.
- Discuss health, short-term benefits.
- Show graphic pictures.
|
| Assist in cessation effort.
- Provide self-help materials.
- Ask all users, " If we give you some help today, are you
willing to try to stop?"
- Refer to dental hygienist to set a quit date and for brief counseling.
|
| Arrange follow-up one week later for re-evaluation of oral lesions
andwith athletic trainer for quit progress, if athlete seeks help to quit
spit tobacco. |
|
Adapted from Smoking Cessation: Clinical Practice Guidelines. USDHHS,
AHCPR Publication No. 96-0694. |
During delivery of the intervention, the dentist-hygienist teams were paired
on site with an experienced dentist-hygienist team from UCSF. This was
done to provide on-site mentoring to ensure quality control and efficiency
in implementing the program and to begin to establish an infrastructure
of Arizona-based dentists and hygienists who could help sustain the program
if it became institutionalized by professional baseball for subsequent
spring trainings.
Program Protocol
Participation in the program was voluntary and in accordance with UCSF
and federal human subjects guidelines. All athletes who agreed to participate
completed a consent form; a confidential health history; and a brief two-page
questionnaire to assess their spit tobacco use status and, for users, their
patterns of use, their previous attempts to quit and methods they used,
their interest in receiving help to quit, and their interest in using nicotine
replacement therapy. After these baseline assessments, each athlete was
given a brief dental inspection to identify those in obvious need of professional
dental care so as to avoid major dental problems during the season. Athletes
who appeared to be in need of dental care were identified to their athletic
trainers.
This brief dental inspection was followed by an oral cancer screening examination.
All athletes screened, regardless of spit tobacco use status, were informed
orally and in writing of any oral mucosal lesions and were scheduled for
follow-up by the athletic trainer and/or club dentist. Nonusers of spit
tobacco were encouraged to remain tobacco free and asked to be supportive
of teammates trying to quit. For each user, the dentist pointed out in
the athlete's mouth any problems associated with spit tobacco use. The
athlete was actively involved in this examination process as a way to increase
his personal involvement in the health effects of his behavior. Spit tobacco-using
athletes without oral problems were shown pictures of other athletes' mouths
showing spit tobacco-related oral disease. Emphasis was placed on the similarity
of the subject in the picture to the athlete being examined and on the
action-consequence relationship. To maintain his involvement, each user
was given a disposable mouth mirror to watch for signs of disease. In addition,
the dentist advised the athlete to quit using all forms of tobacco, offered
assistance with the spit tobacco quitting process on that day, and provided
each user with a copy of a printed self-help guide to quitting spit tobacco
use titled either "Beat the Smokeless Habit -- Game Plan for
Success"1 or "Enuff Snuff."(2)
After the oral cancer screening examination, the dentist sent all spit
tobacco users who wished to quit their tobacco habits to the hygienist
on site for personal instruction on setting a quit date and developing
a plan to get ready to quit and to cope with cravings and triggers for
use. They were also given self-help guides and sample oral non-tobacco
substitutes, and were screened to determine their eligibility for nicotine
replacement therapy in the form of nicotine gum and/or a nicotine patch
system. For those who were eligible for replacement therapy, the hygienist
explained the purpose, methods, risks, and benefits of using the therapy;
answered questions; provided the athlete with a toll-free telephone number
for follow-up consultation with an expert spit tobacco cessation counselor;
and referred him to the athletic trainer for additional help with and monitoring
of his quit attempt. An expert cessation counselor was present during the
oral exam and brief counseling program to observe and provide support if
needed.
After completing the dental component, the dentist and hygienist, along
with the expert cessation counselor, met with the athletic trainers to
identify those athletes who had oral lesions in need of follow-up and those
who had decided to quit their spit tobacco use, set a quit date and had
a plan for getting ready to quit and for coping with the quitting process.
Quit date and copies of the quit plan were shared with the certified athletic
trainers so they could provide ongoing support and encouragement.
At the end of the season, the certified athletic trainers of both clubs
reported on the number of players who actually quit their spit tobacco
use and provided feedback regarding aspects of the program that were perceived
as most helpful.
Results
Prevalence and Patterns of Spit Tobacco Use
A total of 304 athletes (99 major-leaguers and 205 minor-leaguers)
of the two professional baseball clubs participated in the program, representing
about 87 percent of the available club members present at spring training.
Based on self-reports, there were 95 current spit tobacco users (31 percent),
22 former users (7 percent), and 187 nonusers (62 percent). Among the current
users, 61 (64 percent) were daily users, 20 (21 percent) were weekly users,
and 14 (15 percent) reported using two to three times a month. The weekly
and monthly spit tobacco users were combined for analysis into "social"
users, since they reported use of spit tobacco more than once a month,
but not every day. Table 2 shows the characteristics of users overall
and stratified by daily and social users. Overall, 56 percent of current
spit tobacco users had used it for five or more years, and 14 percent for
more than 10 years. The median duration of use was five years. More than
half of the users (53 percent) reported using spit tobacco seasonally rather
than year-round.
| Table 2
Characteristics of Daily, Social, and All Spit Tobacco Users
|
| |
Daily%
(N=61)
|
Social %
(N=34)
|
All %
(N=95)
|
| Type
Snuff exclusively
|
82
|
50 |
71 |
| Chewing tobacco Exclusively |
5
|
29
|
14
|
| Both |
13
|
51
|
16
|
| Duration of use in years |
| < 4 |
21
|
65
|
37
|
| 5-6 |
34
|
18
|
28
|
| 7-9 |
18
|
6
|
14
|
| > 10 |
18
|
6
|
14
|
| Missing |
8
|
6
|
7
|
| Amount used/day |
| <1 |
0
|
41
|
15
|
| 1-4 |
61
|
38
|
53
|
| 5-6 |
25
|
3
|
17
|
| 7-8 |
12
|
0
|
7
|
| Missing |
3
|
18
|
8
|
| Minutes in mouth/use |
| <10 |
13
|
18
|
15
|
| 11-20 |
44
|
47
|
45
|
| 21-30 |
25
|
6
|
18
|
| >30 |
7
|
12
|
8
|
| Missing |
12
|
18
|
14
|
| Use Pattern |
| Year round |
66
|
9
|
45
|
| Seasonal |
31
|
91
|
53
|
| Missing |
3
|
0
|
2
|
| Brand |
| Copenhagen |
61
|
24
|
47
|
| Other dip |
28
|
38
|
32
|
| Chew |
3
|
35
|
15
|
| Missing |
8
|
3
|
6
|
| Mean uses/day |
4
|
1
|
3
|
| Means years of use |
7
|
3
|
5
|
Most spit tobacco users (71 percent) reported using snuff exclusively.
When all current users were asked what brand they usually used, most (47
percent) reported Copenhagen, a high-nicotine brand of snuff. About two-thirds
of users (71 percent) reported keeping a dip or chew in their mouth for
more than 10 minutes at a time, and 24 percent reported using spit tobacco
at least five times a day.
Compared to social users, daily users were more likely to be year-round
users, to use spit tobacco more than five times a day, to keep the tobacco
in their mouth for more than 20 minutes at a time, to have used for five
or more years, and to report use of Copenhagen.
Prevalence of Oral Lesions
Although all 304 athletes completed the questionnaire, only 253 of
them agreed to have an oral examination. Among the 95 spit tobacco users
examined, 53 (56 percent) had spit tobacco-associated oral mucosal lesions.
Of these athletes, 41 (77 percent) were daily users, and 12 (23 percent)
were social users.
Interest in Quitting
Strategies used in previous quit attempts by the 95 current users included
"cold turkey" (55 percent), use of oral substitutes such as mint
snuff (33 percent) or gum and seeds (28 percent), use of the nicotine patch
(6 percent), and use of nicotine gum (5 percent). Almost half of all spit
tobacco users (47 percent) reported at least one previous quit attempt
(Table 3). Fewer than half (45 percent) expressed on the baseline
questionnaire that they would like help quitting that day. Immediately
after the oral exam, however, 71 percent (N=68) actually sought cessation
counseling with the hygienist. Almost half of those athletes who were counseled
(49 percent) set a quit date. About a third of all spit tobacco users (N=31)
expressed interest in the nicotine patch to aid them in their quit attempt,
and 18 percent (N=17) wished to learn about the nicotine spray. More daily
users than social users had previously tried to quit (54 percent vs. 35
percent), expressed a desire for help to quit prior to the oral exam (58
percent vs. 24 percent), wanted to learn more about nicotine replacement
therapy (patch: 41 percent vs. 18 percent; spray: 25 percent vs. 6 percent),
actually sought counseling (82 percent vs. 50 percent), and set a quit
date (48 percent vs. 15 percent).
| Table 3
Distribution of Spit Tobacco Users by Characteristics Associated With
Interest in Quitting.
|
| |
Daily %
(N=61) |
Social %
(N=34) |
All %
(N=95) |
| Stated prior to exam wanted help to quit |
| Yes |
58 |
24 |
45 |
| No |
26 |
52 |
50 |
| Missing |
16 |
24 |
5 |
| Interested in nicotine patch |
| Yes |
41 |
18 |
33 |
| No |
49 |
82 |
61 |
| Missing |
10 |
0 |
6 |
| Interested in nicotine nasal spray |
| Yes |
25 |
6 |
18 |
| No |
54 |
82 |
64 |
| Missing |
21 |
12 |
18 |
| Previous quit attempts |
| Yes |
54 |
35 |
47 |
| No |
26 |
53 |
36 |
| Missing |
20 |
12 |
17 |
| Sought counseling |
| Yes |
82 |
50 |
71 |
| No |
18 |
50 |
29 |
| Set a quit date |
| Yes |
48 |
15 |
35 |
| No |
34 |
35 |
36 |
| Missing |
18 |
50 |
29 |
Motivating Factors
Overall, the most commonly mentioned reasons for trying to quit given
by users who sought counseling immediately after the oral exam were concerns
about health (21 percent), family (10 percent), and addiction (5 percent).
During cessation counseling, users identified situations that increase
risk of using spit tobacco. Use "after a meal" and "when
waiting around bored" were the two trigger situations most often cited.
Situations mentioned solely by daily users were "before going to bed,"
"first thing in the morning," and "driving in a car."
Use of nontobacco oral substitutes was the most common coping strategy
identified by users during counseling (58 percent) and the only one mentioned
by social users. Daily users also cited nicotine replacement (18 percent),
tapering down use (10 percent), doing something else such as exercising
or reading (6 percent), using toothpicks or after dinner mints (4 percent)
after a meal, chewing on cups or straws (4 percent), and use of a support
group (2 percent).
Athletic Trainer Feedback
Of 67 users who sought counseling after the oral exam, 6 (9 percent)
were reported by their athletic trainers at the end of the season to have
quit. The certified athletic trainers for both clubs studied cited feedback
from the oral exam, nicotine replacement, support from team players and
family, and use of alternative behaviors to avoid high-risk situations
as quitting techniques that seemed to be particularly useful. They mentioned,
however, a need for nicotine replacement products in the clubhouse and
for information on the use of other pharmacologic treatments. They also
cited the motivational message presentation, the oral examination by the
dentist, and the expert counselor's meeting with players as the most helpful
parts of the NSTEP program for helping players quit spit tobacco.
Discussion
To counteract the link between baseball and spit tobacco use, Major
League Baseball has participated in a variety of activities to decrease
use in professional baseball. For example, in 1990 Major League Baseball
joined forces with the Professional Baseball Athletic Trainers Society
(PBATS), the National Cancer Institute, and the Fox Chase Cancer Center
in a full-scale educational campaign to teach professional baseball players
and team personnel about the long-term hazards of using spit tobacco.(3)
They worked together to publish Beat the Smokeless Habit1
(a 16-page guide tailored to baseball athletes to help users break their
spit tobacco addiction), an athletic trainer's cessation manual,(4) and
clubhouse posters. These materials were distributed to all major- and minor-league
players early in the 1991 baseball season. In 1993, a formal ban against
spit tobacco use in minor-league baseball was instituted,(5,6) but no consistent
program to help individual professional baseball athletes trying to quit
was put into place. During 1995 and 1996, major-league players working
with the NSTEP partner, Romano and Associates, appeared in antitobacco
public service announcements. Moreover, under the leadership of Joe Garagiola,
the national chairman of NSTEP, NSTEP has provided awareness-raising presentations
on the health risks of spit tobacco use to every professional baseball
club since 1996. Nevertheless, spit tobacco use is still viewed in televised
Major League Baseball games and in ballparks.
Findings from this pilot study are encouraging in that they indicate that
it is feasible to include an oral exam with feedback, advice to quit, and
brief cessation counseling as part of the annual physical exam provided
to professional baseball players at the beginning of spring training. Moreover,
having done so was acceptable to both players and athletic trainers in
the two clubs studied. The unknown is how representative these two clubs
are of the 30 in existence, since the athletic trainers in the pilot study
were knowledgeable about the hazards of spit tobacco use; willing to help
implement the dental component; and motivated to provide support, encouragement,
and nicotine replacement therapy to those athletes attempting to break
their tobacco addiction. It seems reasonable to assume, however, that they
do resemble other professional athletic trainers in baseball, since PBATS
has sponsored many speakers over the years to increase professional baseball's
awareness of the negative health effects of spit tobacco use;(7-9) and,
in 1995, PBATS representatives provided testimony before the U.S. House
Subcommittee on Health and the Environment about the addictive nature of
spit tobacco.(10)
The finding on the baseline questionnaire that 45 percent (N=43) of the
athletes expressed interest in quitting their tobacco use and 47 percent
(N=45) reported a previous quit attempt is consistent with reports from
a 1992 survey of four rookie and short-season single "A" leagues
(N=905) indicating that 63 percent of users reported they wanted to quit
and 40 percent said they had tried to quit unsuccessfully.(11) These data
indicate that many baseball athletes want to quit but need help with the
process.
The fact that 71 percent (N=67) of spit tobacco users in this pilot study
sought cessation counseling with the hygienist immediately after the oral
exam suggests that the exam procedure motivated additional athletes to
seek help to stop their tobacco use. This finding is consistent with three
recent studies of spit tobacco cessation interventions delivered by dental
professionals in the course of routine care,(12 )at college athletic facilities,(13)
and at professional baseball stadiums during the season on a game day.(14)
In the first study,12 dental patients who used spit tobacco daily were
randomly assigned either to usual care or to usual care plus intervention
-- which consisted of an oral mucosal examination with special attention
to oral lesions, cessation advice, a self-help manual, a nine-minute videotape,
a brief counseling session with the dental hygienist, setting a quit date,
a follow-up telephone call, and follow-up mailings. Compared to subjects
in the usual-care group, more subjects in the intervention group reported
abstinence from spit tobacco at three months (32 percent vs. 21 percent,
P<0.01) and at 12 months (18 percent vs. 13 percent, P <0.01).
In the second study,(13) a similar spit tobacco cessation intervention
delivered by a dentist-hygienist team was tested among male college baseball
and football athletes in a randomized controlled trial conducted in 16
California colleges. Unlike the previous study,(12) this study included
spit tobacco users who reported regular but relatively low frequency of
tobacco use (two to three times a month) in addition to daily users. The
intervention included an oral exam and advice to quit by a dentist who
pointed out spit tobacco-associated oral lesions in the athlete's mouth
or in pictures of the mouths of similar-aged athletes, showed graphic pictures
of facial disfigurement due to oral cancer, and provided a self-help guide;(1)
a single 15- to 20- minute cessation counseling session with a hygienist;
and a follow-up telephone call. At one year, prevalence of cessation in
baseball and football teams combined was 35 percent in the intervention
colleges vs. 16 percent in control colleges (P<0.01). Subjects reported
that viewing graphic photographs of oral cancer-related disfigurement of
the face and mouth and receiving a mouth examination with feedback relating
oral tissue damage to spit tobacco use were the most helpful components
of the intervention.
A third dental-based study14 was conducted at a baseball stadium on a game
day during the baseball season. The study objective was to determine the
relative effectiveness of two spit tobacco interventions to promote cessation
among baseball players. Specifically, an oral examination by a dentist
with explanation of spit tobacco-related findings, advice to quit, and
photographs showing spit tobacco-related dental problems with and without
brief counseling by a dental hygienist on how to quit were tested to determine
their effectiveness to help 97 major league baseball athletes stop their
spit tobacco use. Group assignment to either the extended or minimum intervention
group was determined by alternating among the teams according to the order
in which they played their first series in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Of these athletes, 54 received follow-up assessments at the ballpark about
three months after the intervention (28 of these spit tobacco users were
in the extended intervention group and 26 in the minimum intervention group).
At follow-up, prevalence of cessation was 19 percent in the extended intervention
group and 0 percent in the minimum intervention group (P < 0.001), suggesting
the importance of the counseling by the dental hygienist. However, the
most important components of the intervention cited by the subjects were
the photographs of spit tobacco-related dental problems and seeing changes
in their own mouths.
Other reports(15,16) have shown that dental patients who use spit tobacco
expect the dentist and dental hygienist to provide information on the risks
of negative health effects associated with use, but only 50 percent of
the time did they report receiving advice to quit.
In a survey of male college athletes, spit tobacco users were asked to
indicate the three most important items out of a list of 11 that might
influence them to stop using. Out of 473 users, 63 percent indicated "seeing
changes in my teeth and gums due to spit tobacco use" and 61 percent
indicated "a dentist advising me not to use."(17) In a survey
of male dental patients, approximately 40 to 67 percent of the spit tobacco
users reported interest in cessation assistance from the dentist, and among
subjects who received a dental-based intervention, 71 percent indicated
that the advice received from either the dentist or the dental hygienist
significantly influenced their serious consideration of quitting.(12)
The fact that in this pilot study 35 percent (N=33) of the spit tobacco
users set a quit date and only 6 percent (N=6) quit indicates a need for
more intensive problem-solving and supportive treatment to be available
for users. Although many athletes report quitting their tobacco habit abruptly
using the "cold turkey" method, Many users have a hard time quitting
because of a combination of physiological addiction to nicotine, a psychological
dependence on spit tobacco, and a behavioral component that links their
tobacco use with specific activities. Moreover, for baseball athletes,
there is a unique environmental component that supports spit tobacco use
as the social norm; and this provides a special challenge for cessation.
An effective cessation program addresses all four of these dimensions.
Currently, at the mandate of the Players Association, Major League Baseball
plans to include an oral cancer screening exam as part of the annual health
exam for players at the beginning of spring training. Moreover, NSTEP is
consulting with Major League Baseball to facilitate the establishment of
an infrastructure that involves not only the athletic trainers and a dental
professional, but also team physicians and the Employee Assistance Program
staff to provide different levels of ongoing spit tobacco cessation services
for players.
In this pilot study, 39 percent (N=37) of spit tobacco users reported "being
bored while waiting around," (e.g., on the field, in the dugout, or
in the airport) as a high-risk situation for triggering use. In developing
a quit plan with a spit tobacco user, it is important to have him identify
such events or internal states that might cause him to use, and then to
help him decide what he is going to do instead in the future to cope with
these situations.
The majority of spit tobacco users in this pilot study reported daily use.
Compared to social users, these daily users tended to be users of longer
duration, to use snuff more exclusively, to use it more frequently and
with more intensity (as measured by the number of minutes they kept their
dip in their mouth), and to have a higher prevalence of oral lesions associated
with their tobacco use. This is of concern since long-term, frequent, intense
use of spit tobacco, particularly snuff, has been strongly associated with
oral cancer in many studies.(18) Also, because of their nicotine dependence,
daily users most likely will require use of nicotine replacement therapy
to mitigate withdrawal symptoms. In addition, such plans should present
basic information about the nature and time course of withdrawal, the addictive
nature of spit tobacco, and the fact that even a single dip increases the
likelihood of full relapse.(19)
Findings from this pilot study suggest that dental-based spit tobacco interventions
can have a significant impact. Dental professionals are in an excellent
position to advise and assist users to quit, and users appreciate the help.
It is important to remember that quitting tobacco is not a process that
takes place all at once. Cessation appears to occur along a continuum of
change(20,21) in which an individual moves from a precontemplation stage
where he has no thought of quitting, to a contemplation stage where he
thinks he should quit someday but not now. Eventually he arrives at the
readiness stage, where he has a sincere desire to quit and needs encouragement
and support. Next comes the action stage, where he has made a commitment
to stop using permanently, has selected a quit date, has terminated his
tobacco use on that day, and is using a cessation plan to stay abstinent.
In the maintenance stage, he has been tobacco-free for six months and is
learning and practicing new ways of coping. Sometimes there is a relapse
stage, when tobacco behaviors have resumed and may even reach higher levels
than before. Many spit tobacco users try two or three times to quit before
they finally succeed. During all stages, the most important thing is to
remain supportive and nonjudgmental, to watch for and reinforce any signs
of quit readiness, and then to provide ongoing motivation to help the user
create and maintain a positive, self-confident attitude about his cessation
efforts. Even when advised to quit by a dental professional, many spit
tobacco users will not be ready to quit. However, it is important for dental
professionals not to become discouraged, as this pilot study has shown
that their advice can move users closer to the readiness stage.
Conclusion
Clearly, dental professionals can have an important role in helping
young people in California to overcome this rapidly growing addiction.
It is hoped that dentists and dental hygienists will incorporate the key
components of the intervention described here into their clinical practice.
Additionally, local dental and dental hygiene societies may wish to provide
volunteers to work with college athletic trainers to provide oral exams
and brief spit tobacco cessation counseling to athletes in local colleges
during their mandated annual health screenings prior to their athletic
seasons.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the support of the management, athletes,
and coaches of the San Francisco Giants and the Anaheim Angels baseball
organizations, and their respective team dentists, Dr. Charles Pascal and
Dr. Rick Grey. Special thanks to Al Rosen, former president and general
manager of the San Francisco Giants for his early leadership and concern.
We also wish to acknowledge the invaluable efforts of Dr. Rick Lawson,
the team dentist for the Seattle Mariners; Dr. Susan Peterson Mansfield,
Leslie Finta, and Kirsten Jarvi, study dental hygienist-spit tobacco cessation
counselors; T.J. Langer and Gwen Greene, dental recorders; Jana Murray,
RN, and Pat Lee, RN, field coordinators; Joanna Hill, administrative assistant
for the study; Dr. Herb Severson and Dr. Dorothy Hatsukami for expert spit
tobacco cessation advice; and Joe Garagiola for ongoing support and encouragement.
This study was supported in part by Oral Health America.
Authors
Margaret M. Walsh, EdD, is a professor of dental public health and
hygiene at the University of California at San Francisco School of Dentistry.
John C. Greene, DMD, MPH, is a professor and dean emeritus of the UCSF
School of Dentistry.
James A. Ellison, DDS, MPH, is an assistant clinical professor of dental
public health and hygiene at UCSF School of Dentistry.
Mark A. Letendre, ATC, is the head certified athletic trainer for the San
Francisco Giants baseball team.
Ned Bergert, ATC, is the head certified athletic trainer for the Anaheim
Angels baseball team.
References
1. Orleans CT, Connolly GN and Workman S, Beat the Smokeless Habit.
National Cancer Institute, Major League Baseball, PBATS, Fox Chase Cancer
Center, National Institute of Dental Research, NCAA, 1993.
2. Severson H, Enuff Snuff, 4th ed. Applied Behavior Science Press,
1997.
3. Mooney D, PBATS key player in fight against smokeless tobacco. PBATS
Newsletter 5(1):2,7, 1992.
4. Quitting Spit, Advising Athletes About Spit Tobacco: A Guide for
Athletic Trainers and Coaches. National Cancer Institute, Major League
Baseball, PBATS, Fox Chase Cancer Center, NCAA, 1993.
5. "ST" banned in 4 minor leagues. PBATS Newsletter 4(2):6,
1991.
6. Ban on smokeless tobacco expanded to single "A" Ball. PBATS
Newsletter 5(1):7, 1992.
7. U.S. Secretary asks baseball to strike out smokeless tobacco. PBATS
Newsletter 4(2):7, 1991.
8. Mooney D, PBATS enlists United States surgeon general in war on "ST."
PBATS Newsletter 6(1), 1993.
9. PBATS invites former "ST" user to address ballplayers. PBATS
Newsletter 8(1):8, 1995.
10. Mooney D, National and state legislative efforts rely on PBATS. PBATS
Newsletter 8(1):1,8, 1995.
11. 63% of minor league players that use smokeless tobacco want to quit.
PBATS Newsletter 5(1):5, 1992.
12. Stevens VJ, Severson H et al, Making the most of a teachable moment:
a smokeless tobacco cessation intervention in the dental office. Am
J Public Health 85(2):231-5, 1995.
13. Walsh MM, Hilton JEF et al, Spit tobacco cessation intervention for
college athletes: results after one year. JPHA, in press.
14. Greene JC, Walsh MM and Masouredis C, Report of a pilot study: a program
to help major league baseball players quit using spit tobacco. Am J
Publ Hlth 125:559-68, 1994.
15. Severson HH, Eakin EG et al, The inside scoop on the stuff called snuff:
an interview study of 94 adult male smokeless tobacco users. J Substance
Abuse 2:77-85, 1990.
16. Severson HH, Eakin EG et al, Dental office practices for tobacco users:
independent practice and HMO clinics. Am J Public Hlth 80:1503-5,
1990.
17. Walsh MM, Hilton JF et al, Prevalence, patterns and correlates of smokeless
tobacco use in a college athlete population. J Addict Behav 19:411-27,
1994.
18. Winn DM, Blot WJ et al, Snuff dipping and oral cancer among women in
the Southern United States. N Engl J Med 304:745-9, 1981.
19. Smoking Cessation: Clinical Practice Guideline. USDHHS, AHCPR
Publication No. 96-0694, 1996.
20. Prochaska JO and DiClemente CC. The Transtheoretical Approach: Crossing
the Traditional Boundaries of Therapy. Dow Jones/Irwin, Homewood, Ill,
1984.
20. Prochaska JO and DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change
of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol
51:390-5, 1983.
To request a printed copy of this article, please contact/Margaret M. Walsh,
MS, EdD, Department of Dental Public Health and Hygiene, UCSF School of
Dentistry, 707 Parnassus Ave., Room D-1023, San Francisco, CA 94143-0754
|